The comparison between TD SU-100M1 and 1946

1. Penetration depth: the primary role of TD is output, and the output frontal armor than the side of the rear output opportunities. 7 TD, perennial Room 8, the penetration depth of 175mm, playing 59 positive very difficult, so the key data of the SU-100M1 - the depth of penetration, limiting his role.

2. Frontal armor defense: the frontal armor of SU-100M1 unlikely most of his enemies can be no pressure to hit the frontal armor, unfavorable factors for TD perennial frontal armor enemy.

3. Angle of depression: SU-100M1 the depression angle of 5 degrees, the slope is a challenge, more topographical constraints.

Other: SU-100M1 has sibling TD fastest acceleration, steering and concealed these what?

(1) Quickly rushed to the front line, the card is a good location, and steal the enemy a gun and alternative heavy horizontal push all the way, and then as an assault TD?

(2) At the rear, to the use of covert? Opposite the key vehicles could not move a penetration depth of 175mm.

Personal conclusion: SU-100M1 paper advantage, but an easy-to-use car to his advantage items more difficult to play out in the hands of most players, it is recommended to try 1946 more, you will have a different feeling.


Diablo 3 gold